






« the {pure modern} lifestyle | Main | Stickers for microwaves »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834522c5069e201156e78066f970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Sign of the Times:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834522c5069e201156e78066f970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Sign of the Times:
It seems like he might be pandering to the lowest common denominator? I wonder how this changes people's expectations of what architects get paid. I'd say 'yes'
I have mixed feelings about this. I think it's fantastic that he's out there engaging his community and has found a novel way of creating leads. The issue however is putting a perceived value on architectural services that is so very low. In my experience, those who get free or low cost architectural advice very rarely have any intention of paying even half of a traditional architectural fee further down the line. One may argue that charging half a traditional fee is warranted in times like these, but I can't agree with that either. Even for the smallest of small architectural firms, the costs of insurance, registration, supplies, staff, computers and/or drafting equipment, printers etc...it all stacks up very, very quickly. Not to mention that the knowledge of an architectural degree and within the industry itself are worth something too. In fact, knowledge and experience are almost all architects have to separate themselves from other building designers and design/construct companies who will often do the work at a fraction of the cost (and more often than not, a fraction of the quality too).
I worked for an architectural firm for over 4 years that provided low cost advice services, and in that time, out of the hundreds and hundreds of clients, only 2 turned into projects. Both ran at a loss. It was little to do with the quality of the work of the firm, and more to do with the clients attitude that it was just a case of "drawing it up", how hard could it be? One client changed the entire brief of her scheme over 50 times (I kid you not, we exhausted the alphabet), and still didn't understand why we couldn't alter the scheme overnight.
To promote these low cost advice services, we even went to a building exhibition and set up our own stall. I lost count of how many times I heard people say "An architect? What do they do?", and let's not mention how many times I was abused for being "too expensive" before I'd even said a word. To drop our perceived worth to the other end of the spectrum does no favors to any of us, in hard times or in good.
I agree with Dominique, that architects are the least compensated of all the 'professions' and are often their own worst enemy by accepting low fees. I applaud Morefeild for his ingenuity and guts for getting out there to drum up work, but pandering to low fees is killing the profession.
There was a lawyer that gave legal advice in the early nineties somewhere in the San Fernando Valley (Los Angeles), at a hot dog stand on Monday nights..The line was a round the corner..Don't know if he is still doing it..I caught an interview on the news once, and he said that he did it to create leads (with a precise limitations), and for his part--do good for the community..
I disagree that this is pandering or ruining the image of the profession, on the contrary, I have even more respect for architects because of Mr. Morefield..
It seems like he might be pandering to the lowest common denominator? I wonder how this changes people's expectations of what architects get paid. I'd say 'yes'
Posted by: archi_snob | March 27, 2009 at 08:02 PM
I have mixed feelings about this. I think it's fantastic that he's out there engaging his community and has found a novel way of creating leads. The issue however is putting a perceived value on architectural services that is so very low. In my experience, those who get free or low cost architectural advice very rarely have any intention of paying even half of a traditional architectural fee further down the line. One may argue that charging half a traditional fee is warranted in times like these, but I can't agree with that either. Even for the smallest of small architectural firms, the costs of insurance, registration, supplies, staff, computers and/or drafting equipment, printers etc...it all stacks up very, very quickly. Not to mention that the knowledge of an architectural degree and within the industry itself are worth something too. In fact, knowledge and experience are almost all architects have to separate themselves from other building designers and design/construct companies who will often do the work at a fraction of the cost (and more often than not, a fraction of the quality too).
I worked for an architectural firm for over 4 years that provided low cost advice services, and in that time, out of the hundreds and hundreds of clients, only 2 turned into projects. Both ran at a loss. It was little to do with the quality of the work of the firm, and more to do with the clients attitude that it was just a case of "drawing it up", how hard could it be? One client changed the entire brief of her scheme over 50 times (I kid you not, we exhausted the alphabet), and still didn't understand why we couldn't alter the scheme overnight.
To promote these low cost advice services, we even went to a building exhibition and set up our own stall. I lost count of how many times I heard people say "An architect? What do they do?", and let's not mention how many times I was abused for being "too expensive" before I'd even said a word. To drop our perceived worth to the other end of the spectrum does no favors to any of us, in hard times or in good.
Posted by: Dominique | March 27, 2009 at 09:05 PM
I agree with Dominique, that architects are the least compensated of all the 'professions' and are often their own worst enemy by accepting low fees. I applaud Morefeild for his ingenuity and guts for getting out there to drum up work, but pandering to low fees is killing the profession.
Posted by: Orlando | March 27, 2009 at 11:58 PM
There was a lawyer that gave legal advice in the early nineties somewhere in the San Fernando Valley (Los Angeles), at a hot dog stand on Monday nights..The line was a round the corner..Don't know if he is still doing it..I caught an interview on the news once, and he said that he did it to create leads (with a precise limitations), and for his part--do good for the community..
I disagree that this is pandering or ruining the image of the profession, on the contrary, I have even more respect for architects because of Mr. Morefield..
Posted by: Carlos Saldivia | March 30, 2009 at 04:49 PM